Performance management systems vary widely from organization to organization, but there is one aspect that is common across organizations: most line managers hate them. Consider the following three questions:
Given that managers detest working on the key elements of performance management systems, it is no wonder that these systems—even if well-designed—are often poorly implemented—and that’s a problem.
If performance management systems are poorly implemented, then they can’t possibly accomplish what they are supposed to do, namely help organizations improve their overall effectiveness.
What’s worse is that the way they are implemented actually often hurts an organization’s overall performance.
An inward mindset hurts performance management systems on a whole host of levels. When we’re inward, we focus only on our objectives, concerns, and results. The three questions posed above, for example, all have negative answers precisely because managers are only concerned with how they’re affected by their organization’s performance management system. In thinking about how they’re being effected, they don’t always consider the implications for their direct reports or for the organization as a whole.
Even more troubling is that the very nature of many performance management systems actually invites this self-focused way of thinking from the managers and direct reports, hurting overall organizational effectiveness.
While it is generally accepted that the output of effective teams is greater than the sum of individual efforts, organizations continue to measure performance on the scale of the individual, not the team. Measuring only for individual performance can motivate employees to focus on their own results sometimes to the detriment of the team’s or even organization’s results. In measuring individual results, performance management largely ignores the impact that employees have on colleagues while trying to achieve those results.
Imagine a basketball team in which a star player scores the most points but refuses to pass to the ball to his teammates.
The answers are obvious. So why is the selfishness of a star employee who figuratively “refuses to pass the ball to his teammates” often overlooked? Why is it that employees often are rated highly in performance reviews, due to their “great individual results,” without regard for the fact that they are getting in the way of their fellow employees and hurting the organization?
One reason is that managers often think it’s too difficult to assess both the interactions within organizations and the impact of the individual employees on the organization. Our experience, however, has been just the opposite, and we believe that there is a straightforward way to assess an employee’s impact on others.
To do so properly requires an understanding of the organization and its objectives, but here are a few general suggestions:
Sign up for the latest insights & ideas on how to shift mindsets to drive growth.
Diversity, equity, and inclusion training to foster belonging at work is no longer a nice-to-have fo
Often, DEI training programs fail because they prioritize directing employee behaviors instead of ad
We explore how the bell curve approach to employee performance management is limiting—and what org